As the name suggests, the self stirring mug stirs any liquid that it is holding. All you have to do is press a button on the handle. Think about it, you'll never have to hunt for a spoon again - just dump the sugar in your coffee and hit the button.
Mobile
Mobile
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
Self Stirring Mug
As the name suggests, the self stirring mug stirs any liquid that it is holding. All you have to do is press a button on the handle. Think about it, you'll never have to hunt for a spoon again - just dump the sugar in your coffee and hit the button.
HP Pavilion 11-n016tu x360 Review: Making a Statement
by Charles Ikpe,
October 21, 2014
Still, there's more to a device than just looks. HP is hoping its target audience will be tempted by the prospect of a laptop that can be used as a tablet in some situations. Most hybrid laptops, which are becoming popularly known as 2-in-1s, are quite expensive. Such features have so far been reserved for the premium segment. HP is pushing for a bigger slice of the youth market by offering a convertible device at a relatively approachable price level.
Of course, there are going to be tradeoffs - as with all products that try to be two things at once, the HP Pavilion 11 x360 runs the risk of being unable to fit either profile. We'll see if the company has managed to strike the right balance, or if it would make more sense to stick with a regular laptop.
The HP Pavilion 11 x360 is not sleek or compact, as far as 11-inch laptops go. It's quite chunky, though not necessarily too heavy. The proportions give it a solid feel and the sculpted front and rear (more evident in profile) make it less cartoony than it could have turned out.
The bright red body is something you'll either love or hate, though even if it isn't to your taste, you'll agree that it doesn't look tacky. The plastic has a soft matte finish and the construction quality is very reassuring. The red plastic picks up dirt and is even more susceptible to marks caused by sweat or natural oils, which is unfortunate.
While most of the visible outer surface is red plastic, the inside is another matter. The screen is surrounded by thick black borders, and the keyboard deck is metallic silver with only a little red showing through around the edges. The colour combination is quite striking.
All ports and buttons are located around the edges so that they're useful with the keyboard on top or on the bottom. The power button on the left edge is depressed and takes a bit of effort to use. The volume buttons are also mushy, but less so. There's a single USB port and a 3.5mm headset jack on that side, along with a Kensington lock slot. On the right edge, you'll find an Ethernet jack, HDMI video output, two more USB ports and an SD card reader. Sadly, only one of the three USB ports is of the USB 3.0 variety.
We spent a fair bit of time with the Pavilion 11 x360 and found that while it's always nice to have a touchscreen (even if you hardly ever use it), there was no really comfortable way to use it. Even with the screen folded back completely, this product is bulky and unwieldy. Stand mode might be nice for passive use, such as watching movies or video chatting, but anything that requires interaction is better done with the keyboard and trackpad than using touch.
The insides of the Pavilion 11 x360 are decidedly more modest than its flashy exterior. The processor is an entry-level Intel Pentium N3520. It has four cores and runs at 2.17GHz, but is based on the low-power Silvermont architecture and so cannot be compared to the mainstream Intel Core series. The integrated Intel HD Graphics also means you have relatively little horsepower for running anything visually demanding.
You get 4GB of DDR3 RAM which should help keep things snappy, and a 500GB mechanical hard drive. There's Wi-Fi b/g/n but the Ethernet jack is only rated at 10/100Mbps, not the usual 1000Mbps Gigabit speed.
The screen resolution is 1366x768 which is not surprising at all. However, at 11.6 inches, there's a lot more border space around it than we're used to seeing these days, making it feel just a little too small for its body. The screen is not very bright or sharp and is easily washed out in daylight. Viewing angles are also not very impressive.
Overall, the HP Pavilion 11 x360 has enough power to get you through most basic tasks, such as typing documents, browsing the Web and playing music and movies. On the other hand, it's no speed demon, and there are definitely better-equipped laptops in this price range which you can consider if you aren't completely sold on the convertible tablet feature.
With specifications like these, it's clear that the Pavilion 11 x360 is not going to set any performance records. Still, we were satisfied with its speed in day-to-day situations. The screen was fairly disappointing, and we found that the highly reflective panel was more of a problem than the quality of the screen itself.
We used the Pavilion 11 x360 in all its intended modes and found that it wasn't exactly comfortable to use as a tablet. It was convenient to have a keyboard and trackpad that could be unfolded in a few seconds, but that was balanced out by its bulk and weight. The sensation of a hard drive spinning up while we were reclining with the device was also a little disconcerting. The feeling is definitely not the same as when using much slimmer "ultrabook"-style 2-in-1 devices.
Don't expect to be playing any 3D games, although older titles might work at very low quality settings. You should be fine with any of the casual titles available in the Windows Store. We were able to play 1080p video clips, and we were fairly impressed with the sound. Beats Audio branding has been common on HP products for a while, and it's placed rather prominently on the Pavilion 11 x360 too. Music sounds a bit thin and hollow, but is clear. Movie dialogs were crisp and clear enough to be enjoyable without headphones.
Battery life was on the low side - the Pavilion 11 x360 lasted 2 hours, 26 minuntes under Battery Eater Pro in Standard mode, which keeps the screen and processor active. At best, you'll be able to get five or six hours of moderate usage with the screen well below full brightness and Wi-Fi active.
The HP Pavilion 11 x360 is not the right machine for those who are interested in squeezing the best possible performance out of every rupee invested, and are only looking for a vanilla workhorse laptop. Buyers who are looking for something with a little personality and flexibility will really like this device and will not have any trouble with it as long as their expectations are properly calibrated.
Once again, HP has pulled off something unique. It's not going to have mass-market appeal, and that's totally fine. Whether it's worth spending nearly Rs. 40,000 on this computer is entirely a personal decision. There are better touchscreen devices and there are better laptops out there - if you think you'd like an adequate combination of the two worlds and would like to stand out in a sea of black and grey laptops, it's certainly worth considering this model.
Price (MRP): Rs. 39,990 Pros
- Versatile design
- Good looks and construction quality
- Average performance
- Limited connectivity
- Low-quality screen
- Design: 3.5
- Display: 3
- Performance: 3
- Software: 3
- Battery life: 3
- Value for Money: 3
- Overall: 3
Nokia Lumia 830 Review: A Camera Disguised as a Smartphone
Nokia Lumia 830 Review: A Camera Disguised as a Smartphone
by
Ershad Kaleebullah,
October 17, 2014
Microsoft
calls the Lumia 830 an 'affordable flagship'. We presume
this means that this phone has all the features a flagship smartphone
like the Lumia 1020 (Review | Pictures) should have, but is much less expensive. Two phones that
immediately come to mind when we talk about truly affordable flagship
smartphones are the Xiaomi Mi 3 (Review | Pictures) and the OnePlus One.It will be a tall order for Microsoft's new phone to be as disruptive as those two have been.
Those who like engaging in debates about specifications will argue that the Lumia 830 sports only a Snapdragon 400 SoC and a 720p screen, and thus it should qualify as a mid-range phone at best. Well, let us find out if it can rise above all that and stand out as a true 'affordable flagship.
Look and feel
Nokia's (now Microsoft's) Lumia phones adhere to a design language that can be classified as 'iconic' in the world of smartphones. The Lumia 830 carries forward this legacy with a slight twist. The metal body is offset by the presence of a polycarbonate rear shell. These shells are available in four colours - green, orange, black and white - and are interchangeable. The orange variant, which we received for review, takes neon to a whole new level and is a complete departure from the understated silver/black front.
Surprisingly, the there is no mention of Microsoft anywhere on the device, although subtle Nokia logos can be seen on the front and back. The phone has dimensions of 139.4 x 70.7 x 8.5mm and weighs 150g. For a phone with a 5-inch screen it has a good grip, and doesn't feel slippery at all thanks to the polycarbonate rear casing. Furthermore, we can vouch for the sturdiness and the exemplary build quality of the device. You definitely get your money's worth in terms of these two factors.
All
the physical buttons - camera, volume rocker and power - are lined up on
the right edge. The top of the phone has the 3.5mm jack and the
Micro-USB port. Above the display there is the front-facing camera and earpiece, and below it are three capacitive buttons for
navigation, which we are familiar with by now.
The primary camera and flash modules are placed inside a circular cut-out on the rear of the phone. This cut-out is slightly raised, though the plastic rim around it is raised even more. Above the camera, there is a small microphone. The loudspeaker grill sits on the bottom of the rear. On removing the rear cover you can see a Qi wireless charging pad. The phone has slots for a Nano-SIM card and a microSD memory card. The battery is removable.
Specifications and software
Microsoft's Lumia brand phones have internals that are quite similar to those of popular Android smartphones. The Lumia 830 has a quad-core Snapdragon 400 SoC clocked at 1.2GHz with an integrated Adreno 305 GPU. Additionally, it has 1GB of RAM and 16GB of storage space. Users can increase the storage by up to 128GB using a memory card, which is a great option to have. There is also a 2200mAh battery.
The Nokia Lumia 830 has a 10-megapixel PureView camera with a 1/3.4-inch Zeiss lens. The front-facing camera, unlike the Lumia 730's 5-megapixel wide angle one, is a paltry 0.9-megapixel shooter. No stone was left unturned with respect to connectivity options. The phone can establish 3G, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connections, and it also has support for Near-Field Communications (NFC). It can connect to 4G LTE networks and was touted to be the first Windows-based smartphone to have support for Indian networks but unfortunately those rumours turned out to be inaccurate. The 5-inch IPS LCD screen has a resolution of 720x1280.
The screen also benefits from Nokia's ClearBlack
technology and has Corning's Gorilla Glass 3 for protection. While the
display doesn't have the deep blacks we are accustomed to seeing on
AMOLED screens, we think the colours are quite natural, and the warm colour tone is easy on the eye. Sunlight
legibility is insanely good and no matter how brightly the sun shone, we could see the screen clearly. Viewing
angles on the other hand are not too great as we noticed the screen
washing out pretty easily when seen at an angle.
This is one of the first phones to come with Nokia's Denim update, exclusive to Lumia smartphones running Windows Phone 8.1 Update 1. The Denim update adds a ton of camera features, which we will explore extensively. Windows 8.1 Update 1. brings Cortana to India in public alpha form and it works fine. Before getting it to work one has to download the English (UK) language pack. It Users can now also add 'Live Folders' to the start screen. Additionally, this update also brings speed enhancements to the Internet Explorer browser.
Windows
Phone is catching up to the competition in terms of features and
usability. While not as extensive as the implementations in Android and
iOS, the fact that there is an Action Centre is a definite advantage.
Features such as Battery Sense and Storage Sense are really good
too, letting users understand vital statistics and
take decisions accordingly. Bing now lets users
perform a full device search instead of just searching the Web. We are
also fans
of the new Word Flow keyboard which builds upon the already robust
performance of the regular keyboard so users can swipe to type.
There are tons of preloaded apps on the phone, most of which are useful, such as BoxTV, Facebook, Flipboard, Food and Drink (MSN), Gameloft GameHub, Here Drive+, Here Maps, Lumia Beamer, Nokia MixRadio, PicsArt, Snapdeal, TimesCity and WeChat. Thankfully, apps that users don't want or need can be uninstalled.
Camera
The new Lumia Denim update brings a number of new camera features. Whether they are useful or not, they are nice to have. Our favourite app by far is Lumia Refocus, which emulates in software what a Lytro camera can do. It works really well too - essentially, the camera does a focus sweep and captures multiple images at different focus points. Later, the user can change the part or parts of the image that are in focus. We got some dramatic results when subjects in the background and the foreground were clearly defined. Remember that a high depth of field is essential for accurate results. In case you want to share your photos on social networks, Microsoft uploads each file to OneDrive and then creates unique links pointing to refocus.nokia.com.
Lumia Cinemagraph at its most basic level is a GIF file creator, and Lumia Storyteller uses Nokia's HERE Maps, points of interests, the time and the date to create mini collections of important moments.
Apart from these embellishments, there are two
camera apps - the default Windows Phoen app and Nokia Camera (soon to be
rechristened Lumia Camera). Nokia Camera is a feature-rich app with a
lot of manual options that would make any pro user happy. The only caveat is
that new users might find the app slightly difficult to use.
(click for full size)
Now for to the most important part of this review: the camera. It performs well in all conditions. The PureView technology comes to life as soon as we fire up the 10-megapixel shooter. We captured some incredible details with the most natural colour reproduction in daylight. Click on the image above and zoom in to see for yourself how the camera has managed to capture even the microscopic fibres on the edges of leaves. The camera is really fast at focusing most of the time. We are really nitpicking here, but on very rare occasions the camera failed to focus on the desired subject. Most users will not encounter this often enough for it to be a problem.
The best part about the camera is its performance in low light. The camera lets in more than enough light and captures details that cameras in other flagship smartphones cannot even hope to. Optical image stabilisation (OIS) plays a huge part in this. The front camera on the other hand is a huge letdown and we cannot understand why Microsoft didn't go with a better spec than the 0.9-megapixel shooter. It captures okay details in daylight and might work for some users. If you are someone who likes to pout for the camera at the drop of the hat then we'd suggest taking a look at the Nokia Lumia 730 Dual SIM instead.
(click for full size)
By default, the camera captures video at 720p but you can easily bump this up to 1080p. Our test video showed good details and colours, which was not unexpected, but the OIS was not very effective here.
Performance
It is quite established now that Windows Phone 8.1 performs well even on smartphones with 512MB of RAM. Case in point: the Lumia 630. The 1GB of RAM and Snapdragon 400 SoC in the Lumia 830 are more than enough for the operating system to work smoothly. We didn't face any lags or hold ups.
We ran a few benchmarks to measure raw performance. In our AnTuTu benchmark the phone scored 11,975 points whereas in WPbench it scored 227. The GFXbench test returned a low score of only 7.2fps. Gaming might not be a smooth experience on this phone.
The Lumia 830 features Dolby
Surround Sound. The enhancement option is in switched on by default.
Leveraging this feature, the speakers emit really loud sound but at
high volume we could clearly hear crackling. The bundled headset
is good enough for most purposes but after plugging in our reference
earphones, we were treated to some really tight sound.
As is with most Nokia phones, the quality of sound in phone calls is really good and there is nothing really to complain about here. Our battery loop test went on for 10 hours and 48 minutes before the phone had to be recharged. This is pretty good and users should easily be able to use this phone for a day without worrying about charging it. There is also a nifty battery saver option that works really well too.
Verdict
The Lumia 830 is a camera lover's dream smartphone. We would even go as far as to say that it negates the need to invest in a digital camera. Calling this smartphone an 'affordable flagship' might actually be okay considering its camera performance and price of Rs. 28,799. For those who argue that the Moto G (Gen 2) [Review | Pictures] has similar specs and is priced much lower than this phone should understand that the Lumia 830's camera performance is miles ahead and its build quality simply cannot be matched by Motorola's budget champion. If you are someone who is platform agnostic then the newly launched Moto X (Gen 2) [Review | Pictures] might be considered an alternative.
Yes, the Lumia 830 should probably have been a little less expensive, but even at this price it is a good buy for those who use the camera app more than the phone app and are willing to live with an ecosystem that is still a fair way behind the competition.

Those who like engaging in debates about specifications will argue that the Lumia 830 sports only a Snapdragon 400 SoC and a 720p screen, and thus it should qualify as a mid-range phone at best. Well, let us find out if it can rise above all that and stand out as a true 'affordable flagship.
Nokia's (now Microsoft's) Lumia phones adhere to a design language that can be classified as 'iconic' in the world of smartphones. The Lumia 830 carries forward this legacy with a slight twist. The metal body is offset by the presence of a polycarbonate rear shell. These shells are available in four colours - green, orange, black and white - and are interchangeable. The orange variant, which we received for review, takes neon to a whole new level and is a complete departure from the understated silver/black front.
Surprisingly, the there is no mention of Microsoft anywhere on the device, although subtle Nokia logos can be seen on the front and back. The phone has dimensions of 139.4 x 70.7 x 8.5mm and weighs 150g. For a phone with a 5-inch screen it has a good grip, and doesn't feel slippery at all thanks to the polycarbonate rear casing. Furthermore, we can vouch for the sturdiness and the exemplary build quality of the device. You definitely get your money's worth in terms of these two factors.
The primary camera and flash modules are placed inside a circular cut-out on the rear of the phone. This cut-out is slightly raised, though the plastic rim around it is raised even more. Above the camera, there is a small microphone. The loudspeaker grill sits on the bottom of the rear. On removing the rear cover you can see a Qi wireless charging pad. The phone has slots for a Nano-SIM card and a microSD memory card. The battery is removable.
Microsoft's Lumia brand phones have internals that are quite similar to those of popular Android smartphones. The Lumia 830 has a quad-core Snapdragon 400 SoC clocked at 1.2GHz with an integrated Adreno 305 GPU. Additionally, it has 1GB of RAM and 16GB of storage space. Users can increase the storage by up to 128GB using a memory card, which is a great option to have. There is also a 2200mAh battery.
The Nokia Lumia 830 has a 10-megapixel PureView camera with a 1/3.4-inch Zeiss lens. The front-facing camera, unlike the Lumia 730's 5-megapixel wide angle one, is a paltry 0.9-megapixel shooter. No stone was left unturned with respect to connectivity options. The phone can establish 3G, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connections, and it also has support for Near-Field Communications (NFC). It can connect to 4G LTE networks and was touted to be the first Windows-based smartphone to have support for Indian networks but unfortunately those rumours turned out to be inaccurate. The 5-inch IPS LCD screen has a resolution of 720x1280.
This is one of the first phones to come with Nokia's Denim update, exclusive to Lumia smartphones running Windows Phone 8.1 Update 1. The Denim update adds a ton of camera features, which we will explore extensively. Windows 8.1 Update 1. brings Cortana to India in public alpha form and it works fine. Before getting it to work one has to download the English (UK) language pack. It Users can now also add 'Live Folders' to the start screen. Additionally, this update also brings speed enhancements to the Internet Explorer browser.
There are tons of preloaded apps on the phone, most of which are useful, such as BoxTV, Facebook, Flipboard, Food and Drink (MSN), Gameloft GameHub, Here Drive+, Here Maps, Lumia Beamer, Nokia MixRadio, PicsArt, Snapdeal, TimesCity and WeChat. Thankfully, apps that users don't want or need can be uninstalled.
The new Lumia Denim update brings a number of new camera features. Whether they are useful or not, they are nice to have. Our favourite app by far is Lumia Refocus, which emulates in software what a Lytro camera can do. It works really well too - essentially, the camera does a focus sweep and captures multiple images at different focus points. Later, the user can change the part or parts of the image that are in focus. We got some dramatic results when subjects in the background and the foreground were clearly defined. Remember that a high depth of field is essential for accurate results. In case you want to share your photos on social networks, Microsoft uploads each file to OneDrive and then creates unique links pointing to refocus.nokia.com.
Lumia Cinemagraph at its most basic level is a GIF file creator, and Lumia Storyteller uses Nokia's HERE Maps, points of interests, the time and the date to create mini collections of important moments.
Now for to the most important part of this review: the camera. It performs well in all conditions. The PureView technology comes to life as soon as we fire up the 10-megapixel shooter. We captured some incredible details with the most natural colour reproduction in daylight. Click on the image above and zoom in to see for yourself how the camera has managed to capture even the microscopic fibres on the edges of leaves. The camera is really fast at focusing most of the time. We are really nitpicking here, but on very rare occasions the camera failed to focus on the desired subject. Most users will not encounter this often enough for it to be a problem.
The best part about the camera is its performance in low light. The camera lets in more than enough light and captures details that cameras in other flagship smartphones cannot even hope to. Optical image stabilisation (OIS) plays a huge part in this. The front camera on the other hand is a huge letdown and we cannot understand why Microsoft didn't go with a better spec than the 0.9-megapixel shooter. It captures okay details in daylight and might work for some users. If you are someone who likes to pout for the camera at the drop of the hat then we'd suggest taking a look at the Nokia Lumia 730 Dual SIM instead.
By default, the camera captures video at 720p but you can easily bump this up to 1080p. Our test video showed good details and colours, which was not unexpected, but the OIS was not very effective here.
Performance
It is quite established now that Windows Phone 8.1 performs well even on smartphones with 512MB of RAM. Case in point: the Lumia 630. The 1GB of RAM and Snapdragon 400 SoC in the Lumia 830 are more than enough for the operating system to work smoothly. We didn't face any lags or hold ups.
We ran a few benchmarks to measure raw performance. In our AnTuTu benchmark the phone scored 11,975 points whereas in WPbench it scored 227. The GFXbench test returned a low score of only 7.2fps. Gaming might not be a smooth experience on this phone.
As is with most Nokia phones, the quality of sound in phone calls is really good and there is nothing really to complain about here. Our battery loop test went on for 10 hours and 48 minutes before the phone had to be recharged. This is pretty good and users should easily be able to use this phone for a day without worrying about charging it. There is also a nifty battery saver option that works really well too.
The Lumia 830 is a camera lover's dream smartphone. We would even go as far as to say that it negates the need to invest in a digital camera. Calling this smartphone an 'affordable flagship' might actually be okay considering its camera performance and price of Rs. 28,799. For those who argue that the Moto G (Gen 2) [Review | Pictures] has similar specs and is priced much lower than this phone should understand that the Lumia 830's camera performance is miles ahead and its build quality simply cannot be matched by Motorola's budget champion. If you are someone who is platform agnostic then the newly launched Moto X (Gen 2) [Review | Pictures] might be considered an alternative.
Yes, the Lumia 830 should probably have been a little less expensive, but even at this price it is a good buy for those who use the camera app more than the phone app and are willing to live with an ecosystem that is still a fair way behind the competition.
Smart earpiece with biometric sensors soon to replace fitness bands
Yes, there are a lot of wearable devices that can monitor your activities and health, but an earpiece called SensoTRACK claims to be able to do it all. By "all," we mean it can measure respiration and heart rates, detect oxygen saturation in your body and provide an almost real-time blood pressure reading. It can also count your steps and the calories you burn, measure your speed and activity level during exercise, track your weight, BMI, blood sugar levels and your emotional state. Its creators even claim that it's more accurate than wrist gadgets, because it's worn in your ear, and hence located near the temporal artery. As you'd expect, SensoTRACK connects to an Android or an iOS app, as well as to a desktop portal (via Bluetooth LE or microUSB), which list all your stats, workout history, goals and routes taken. But, in case you're stuck somewhere without access to phones or computers, you can always save up to a week's worth of data on its onboard storage.
According to the device's Kickstarter page, the startup already has a final prototype, and it's just a matter of raising enough money to fund its production. The company hopes to raise a rather hefty $250,000 to be able to ship it to backers by April 2015 at the earliest. In case SensoTRACK doesn't reach its goal, though, you have a number of other devices to choose from, depending on what you need. These include Garmin's new watch that monitors your body's oxygen volume, LG's and SMS Audio's heart rate-tracking earbuds, and Samsung's Gear Fit with heart rate monitor, among many, many others.
Apple Lovers, Here is the Full Review on The iPad Air 2 and iPad mini 3
It's a conflicting time for Apple. On one hand, it's a joyous occasion for the company because its latest iPhones, which come in larger screen sizes than the last, set new sales records worldwide; but on the other hand, its lineup of iPads just experienced its third straight quarterly decline. Coincidentally, this comes just a week after Apple announced its annual tablet refresh, which includes a thinner and more powerful version of the iPad Air along with a Touch ID-enabled mini with Retina display.
Just because it's down doesn't mean it's out. Giving up on a product category isn't really Apple's style, and last week, it offered up the Air 2 as exhibit A. The company made it clear that making a solid top-of-the-line tablet is on the top of its to-do list, so naturally the new 10-inch device got plenty of upgrades in nearly every aspect of its design. Curiously, it didn't give the mini lineup the same kind of treatment: The mini 3 got so little love this time around that the best news about it is the fact that last year's version is now $100 cheaper. Should the new iPads still get a place in the consumer's backpack? Read on to find out.
90
Apple
iPad Air 2
Pros
- Beautiful, thin aluminum design
- Incredibly powerful A8X chip
- Touch ID included
- Upgraded camera
Cons
- Battery life could be better
- Some will miss the mute switch
Summary
The iPad Air 2 is Apple's most powerful tablet yet, and is
incredibly thin and light. It's a solid upgrade over last year's Air,
and should definitely be one of your top tablet considerations.
85
Apple
iPad mini 3
Pros
- Touch ID now comes included
- Long battery life
- Good performance
Cons
- Only a couple of upgrades
- Commands a $100 premium over last year's model
Summary
The iPad mini 3 is just as good as its predecessor, but its lack of
feature upgrades doesn't justify its price and places it behind the Air
2 in specs. Unless you love Apple's fingerprint sensor and Apple Pay,
you may want to opt for last year's model instead.
Hardware
iPad Air 2
Thinner, lighter, more powerful. It sounds a lot like last year's iPad Air, which was reduced to the thickness of a pencil, but in fact, I'm talking about the sequel. At 6.1mm thick, an 18 percent decrease from the original Air's 7.5mm, you'll be hard-pressed to find a thinner tablet; Samsung's Tab S comes close at 6.6mm. It's not easy to build such a thin device that feels just as sturdy as its thicker brethren, but Apple nailed it with the Air 2. The new slate has lost weight, too, but not as much as the last one did: While the first Air managed to lose nearly half a pound over the iPad 4, the next version only trims off 0.04 pound (32g) for a total of 0.96 pound (the LTE-enabled version is a few grams heavier). So, it's lighter, but the change isn't anywhere near as noticeable this time around.The design language hasn't changed: The Air still features an aluminum build, chamfered edges and the same footprint as before. But Apple insists that it rebuilt the new tablet from the ground up. After all, cramming better specs into a thinner package requires some creative thinking. The good news is that it looks and feels fantastic, and it comes with a no-gap display, better camera, more powerful chipset, Touch ID and stronger wireless connections. The bad news is that some compromises were made -- specifically in the area of battery size, which has plummeted from 32.4Whr to 27.3 (more on this later).
The Air 2 also doesn't have a mute switch, which I didn't think would be a huge loss until I actually found myself trying to use it and becoming frustrated more frequently than I expected. Your new options are to press and hold the volume down button or go into the Control Center and press the mute key; if you used the switch to lock screen orientation, you'll need to do that in the Control Center as well. A microphone now sits where the mute switch once was; there's another one right next to the camera. This means the antenna on the top of the WiFi+Cellular model is no longer interrupted by mic holes.
iPad mini 3
Indeed, there's only one major feature change on the mini 3: Touch ID. Yep, that's all, unless you count a gold color option as an actual feature (I don't). Otherwise, the hardware is completely identical to last year's mini. All of the stuff you just read (and will continue to read) about getting improved on the Air 2? Nowhere to be found. The dimensions and design style all remain the same as the last mini. Whereas Apple says it built the Air 2 from the ground up, the mini 3 just seems like an afterthought to make it look like the mini line hasn't been forgotten. Well, it hasn't been, but it does look strange that the larger tablet is once again considered the premier option with the best specs. The sudden change in product strategy doesn't add up.
Apple SIM
My review units came with carrier-branded SIMs, but the Apple-specific chips should come preinstalled when they're shipped. (If you prefer a non-supported carrier, such as Verizon, a new chip will be provided for you.) There's still no way of knowing whether this is a proprietary technology or if Apple is licensing it; if it's the latter, it's possible that the option will eventually be available for non-Apple devices as well.
Display
For the iPad mini, I have a confession to make. As I reviewed last year's model, I praised the display for its high pixel density and good looks -- and in many ways this still rings true a full year later -- but I didn't catch a glaring difference between it and the original iPad Air's display: The colors on the mini with Retina display have a narrower gamut than the Air, so the hues are flatter; they simply don't provide the same kind of punch that the Air does. That was something I didn't want to miss again, so I took a closer look to see if Apple had corrected anything on the mini 3, or if the color gamut would remain consistent among all three devices in the series. If you didn't like it before, expect to see more of the same; any changes in color accuracy are extremely minor, as the Air lineup continues to offer a better experience here than the mini. The below image shows the difference between the Air 2 and the mini 3 displays.
iOS 8.1
iOS 8.1 is the third update to Apple's new mobile OS in just over a month, after a bug fix that was immediately followed by another fix to correct the problems introduced in that initial update. The refresh was made available to every compatible iPhone and iPad yesterday, and the new iPads will come with it preinstalled, bypassing the lengthy download and install process.Because the Air 2 and mini 3 both use Touch ID, they can take advantage of the biggest new feature in the update: Apple Pay. But since they don't have Near-Field Communication (NFC) chips installed, you can't do tap to pay; you can only use the service for online payments. This isn't a huge issue, since most people will prefer using their phones (or Apple Watch) to buy stuff in retail outlets; it'd be much easier to whip out my wallet and swipe my card than take an iPad out of my bag to use tap-to-pay.
Apple Pay isn't the only benefit you get in 8.1. In the initial iOS 8 release, the company oddly left out the Camera Roll. You could still see all of the images you took on your phone or tablet, but if you were using iCloud and had multiple devices, there was no way to tell which photo or video was taken on which product. This week, it's back in the Albums tab.
With 8.1, you'll also get to beta test the iCloud Photo Library, which uploads and stores your collection o' memories so that you can edit and share them from any of your Apple devices. If you have less than 5GB in your album and don't want to pay anything, it's definitely worth doing. If you've got more than that, you'll need to pony up some cash in order to store it all: 20GB costs a dollar per month in the US; 200GB is $4; 500GB is $10; and 1TB is $20.
Finally, 8.1 enables some of the Handoff and Continuity features I discussed in the iOS 8 review, such as sending and receiving text messages on your Mac, and Instant Hotspot, which makes it possible to automatically tether your computer to your mobile device. These features were announced as part of iOS 8 in June, but needed Apple's new desktop operating system, OS X Yosemite, to work properly.
Camera
I'll be the first to admit that I'm not the target demographic for a tablet camera. I used to make fun of the whole idea of taking pictures with a 10-inch gadget, but clearly it's a trend that's not going away, as a brief visit to any theme park, tourist attraction, concert or Vegas sidewalk will prove. So, I can't blame Apple for catering to this growing group of people who prefer a large viewfinder. The iPad Air 2 is a prime example of this. While the mini 3 doesn't gain improved imaging capabilities, the Air 2 steps up to 8MP resolution (versus 5MP in the Air) and has a new Image Signal Processor (ISP) as part of the new A8X chipset. On the software side, the new camera comes with Burst Mode, as well as slow-motion video capture in 720p at 120fps. There's still no LED flash on front or back this time around, however.Overall, the improvement in detail is obvious, and imaging is noticeably better in a few other areas as well. The white balance is slightly improved; colors are a little more accurate; and harshly backlit images aren't as blown out as they were on the previous Air. And although the f/2.4 aperture is the same on both cameras, the new ISP manages to filter out more noise in low-light situations; it still won't catch as much errant light as the iPhone, however. Apple also says the 1.2MP FaceTime camera should do a better job of reducing noise, but I couldn't see any real difference in side-by-side comparisons.
(You can see full-res images taken by the Air 2 camera here, and samples from the original Air can be found here.)
Performance and battery life
| iPad Air 2 | iPad Air | iPad mini 3 | NVIDIA Shield Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 3.0 | 4,510 | 2,646 | 2,470 | 3,423 |
| Basemark X | 29,518 | 15,231 | 14,839 | TBD |
| 3DMark IS Unlimited | 21,659 | 15,536 | 14,595 | 30,970 |
| SunSpider 1.0 (ms) | 303 | 404 | 439 | 463 |
| GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Off/onscreen (fps) | 32.4/24.6 | 13.0/8.8 | 13.0/8.8 | 31.0/29.7 |
| SunSpider: Lower scores are better. | ||||
So yes, the iPad was powerful before, and it's even more so now. Apple says the new chip is optimized for apps and games that use Metal, a framework that gets rid of a lot of the overhead that gets between a developer and the GPU. It also takes advantage of 3D graphics processing and other advanced computing capabilities. The A8X will increase the performance of every app regardless of whether or not they use Metal, but I focused more heavily on apps and games that do.
One such app was Replay, a video highlight tool featured in last week's keynote. The app takes images you've curated from your photo library and puts them into a cool montage-like video; you can add music, text and other effects to give some extra pizzazz to your Facebook slideshow of the family trip to Disneyland. The A8X showed its chops when it was time to save and render the video; I did the same exact video on both iPad Airs (iPads Air?), and the original wasn't even halfway through the job when the Air 2 completed the task.
It's clear that the A8X can make a huge difference over the A7 in many areas, but I didn't see as drastic a performance improvement with existing games that use Metal. I tried several, such as Asphalt 8, Beach Buggy Racing, Modern Combat 5 and Epic Zen Garden. As expected, I experienced fewer frame skips, smoother play and faster load times, all of which are nearly givens anytime there's a boost in graphics capacity. And the Air 2 is a winner for this alone. The only downside was that I saw the same number of fine details in the A8X during gameplay as I saw in the A7. When comparing the two Airs side by side, I saw the same reflections in puddles, blazing fires, other characters, falling buildings, exploding helicopters and other elements. Still good, but not a night-and-day difference. The improvements in this area were not as noticeable as I'd anticipated, but hopefully A8X-optimized games will come out soon that push the chip's graphics capabilities to the limit.
The benchmarks sided with Replay in terms of performance. I saw massive bumps in test scores on Geekbench 3 and Basemark X (nearly double that of the Air), as well as a 6,000-point increase on 3DMark. I also notched a 25 percent decrease in SunSpider, which was the lowest score I've ever seen on any mobile device (SunSpider scores are like golf -- the lower the better); finally, I was also impressed by the onscreen and offscreen GFXBench results. However, while the iPad is still among the most powerful tablets on the market, it's got some serious competition; the NVIDIA Tegra K1-powered Shield Tablet crunches some numbers that surpass the Air 2's scores, with others getting incredibly close.
| Tablet | Battery Life |
|---|---|
| iPad Air 2 | 11:15 |
| iPad mini 3 | 13:45 |
| Microsoft Surface 2 | 14:22 |
| iPad Air | 13:45 (LTE) |
| Apple iPad mini | 12:43 (WiFi) |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S (10-inch) | 12:30 |
| Apple iPad mini with Retina display | 11:55 (LTE) |
| Apple iPad (late 2012) | 11:08 (WiFi) |
| Apple iPad 2 | 10:26 |
| Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 | 10:04 |
| Apple iPad (2012) | 9:52 (HSPA) / 9:37 (LTE) |
| Acer Iconia W4 | 9:50 |
| Nexus 7 (2012) | 9:49 |
| Microsoft Surface RT | 9:36 |
| Toshiba Encore | 8:45 |
| Sony Xperia Tablet Z | 8:40 |
| Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet | 7:57 |
| Nexus 10 | 7:26 |
| Dell Venue 8 Pro | 7:19 |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 | 7:18 |
| Nexus 7 (2013) | 7:15 |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4 | 7:13 |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 | 6:55 |
On the plus side, the loudspeakers have improved. In side-by-side tests with the original Air, the sequel's speakers produced even louder and fuller sound than its predecessor, which came in handy while listening to podcasts and streaming music around the house.
The competition
The new iPads aren't the only show in town. Google's Nexus 9, which comes out in two weeks, will likely be a strong performer thanks to its NVIDIA K1 chip, a 2.3GHz dual-core processor with 64-bit support. (This is the "Denver" variant of the chip inside the NVIDIA Shield, so the Nexus 9 should keep up with the Air 2.) Apple got a nice head start on 64-bit support when it released the A7 chip last year, so it'll take some time for developers to take full advantage of their newfound abilities. The baseline, WiFi-only Nexus 9, which includes 16GB of internal storage, will go for $399; this puts it as solid competition against the mini 3, although its screen size is right in between the mini and Air. There's also the Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet, which is now going for around $460 and packs plenty of punch, and the Samsung Tab S, which comes with an octa-core chip and 3GB of RAM for the same price as the Air 2.
The mini 3 will also soon have to compete against Sony's Z3 Tablet Compact, an 8-inch waterproof slate that is now available for pre-order. It's 6.4mm thin and comes with a 2.5GHz quad-core Snapdragon processor with 3GB of RAM, but you're also paying for the extra features: it's priced starting at $499, which is a fair amount higher than Apple's already high-priced option.
If you like the smaller form factor, but don't love the price, there's also the Shield Tablet, which comes with the aforementioned K1 chip and is available starting at $299; it's more gaming-minded than your usual Android tablet, but it's a fantastic performer that soundly beats out the mini 3. There's also the Google Nexus 7, which was discontinued, but still available on Amazon and other retailers for around $200. And finally, last year's iPad mini with Retina display is now $100 cheaper at $299, while the original mini is $249. However, that $50 difference also means you lose the Retina display; it's definitely worth the money to go with the higher resolution. Likewise, the original Air is now $399, $100 cheaper than its successor.
Wrap-up
That said, I'm not sure where the mini 3 fits into Apple's strategy. Since the only hardware improvement to the new slate is Touch ID, the mini lineup is no longer on par with the Airs; it's now a second-class tablet citizen. I love Touch ID, and I favor the screen size of the mini, but it's not worth paying an extra $100 for Apple's fingerprint sensor unless you use a ton of passwords or want to make a lot of online Apple Pay purchases. It's still a great performer, but I can't help but wonder if the mini lineup can remain relevant at its price point -- especially now that 5.5-inch iPhones are even more portable and still offer a large screen.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)